|
Post by neufab94 on Sept 2, 2023 4:03:04 GMT -7
I noticed that most threads on here are relatively specific to players, GM'ing, game day, and so forth. This thread is intended to discuss the other things. Examples include line strategy, play style, general philosophy, or things not in the other threads.
Regarding general game play philosophy I believe in showing no mercy in order to hone the killer instinct even if it runs up the score. Last season I saw too often the Oilers dominant for a good stretch of time and then take the foot off the gas. This creates bad habits. Maybe I will dive a little deeper into this in time.
On a different note. There is often chatter surrounding "destination" cities, or the perception of them. I think there is more hype and media propaganda than there is truth to the perception. I think each of the original 6 teams have high pressure not just the Canadian teams. Minnesota I suggest would also be a "fishbowl" market. Vegas I argue is not all it's cracked up to be. I for one can dress for minus 22 but can only get so naked in plus 42. I have been to all of the western cities and Montreal in the east. I find pros and cons in each one.
Another point of consideration would be the differential of pricing across the league both for tickets and concessions, give aways, corporate vs individual ticket sales, expansion, another Canadian team, and probably more.
|
|
|
Post by drtaf on Sept 2, 2023 18:19:42 GMT -7
I noticed that most threads on here are relatively specific to players, GM'ing, game day, and so forth. This thread is intended to discuss the other things. Examples include line strategy, play style, general philosophy, or things not in the other threads. Regarding general game play philosophy I believe in showing no mercy in order to hone the killer instinct even if it runs up the score. Last season I saw too often the Oilers dominant for a good stretch of time and then take the foot off the gas. This creates bad habits. Maybe I will dive a little deeper into this in time. On a different note. There is often chatter surrounding "destination" cities, or the perception of them. I think there is more hype and media propaganda than there is truth to the perception. I think each of the original 6 teams have high pressure not just the Canadian teams. Minnesota I suggest would also be a "fishbowl" market. Vegas I argue is not all it's cracked up to be. I for one can dress for minus 22 but can only get so naked in plus 42. I have been to all of the western cities and Montreal in the east. I find pros and cons in each one. Another point of consideration would be the differential of pricing across the league both for tickets and concessions, give aways, corporate vs individual ticket sales, expansion, another Canadian team, and probably more. I'd like to see a level playing field, both on the ice and off the ice. On the ice, the refs have so much power they can literally decide who wins who loses. More rules need to be hard and fast and a lot less discretionary rules. Off the ice, the cap should be set based on a single point of reference. ie some USA teams can offer a guy $10M per year knowing that in their state thats equivalent to $12-13M for another USA or Canadian team because the player knows his take home will be the same or more in the tax free state. The NHL needs to have some kind of floating adjustment to account for this and for the fact cdn teams primary income source is cdn $$. It wouldn't be too hard to figure out, but will these things happen? I doubt it given how much the NHL now already depends on so much gambling revenue. There will be a lot of pressure on the NHL to see big market American teams do well because they will generate most revenue for their gambling sponsors. You see it in a lot of other sports already..Soccer, F1, any sport that generates massive billion dollar sponsorship deals, so I can actually see more manipulation in the future, not less.
|
|
|
Post by neufab94 on Sept 3, 2023 10:48:06 GMT -7
I noticed that most threads on here are relatively specific to players, GM'ing, game day, and so forth. This thread is intended to discuss the other things. Examples include line strategy, play style, general philosophy, or things not in the other threads. Regarding general game play philosophy I believe in showing no mercy in order to hone the killer instinct even if it runs up the score. Last season I saw too often the Oilers dominant for a good stretch of time and then take the foot off the gas. This creates bad habits. Maybe I will dive a little deeper into this in time. On a different note. There is often chatter surrounding "destination" cities, or the perception of them. I think there is more hype and media propaganda than there is truth to the perception. I think each of the original 6 teams have high pressure not just the Canadian teams. Minnesota I suggest would also be a "fishbowl" market. Vegas I argue is not all it's cracked up to be. I for one can dress for minus 22 but can only get so naked in plus 42. I have been to all of the western cities and Montreal in the east. I find pros and cons in each one. Another point of consideration would be the differential of pricing across the league both for tickets and concessions, give aways, corporate vs individual ticket sales, expansion, another Canadian team, and probably more. I'd like to see a level playing field, both on the ice and off the ice. On the ice, the refs have so much power they can literally decide who wins who loses. More rules need to be hard and fast and a lot less discretionary rules. Off the ice, the cap should be set based on a single point of reference. ie some USA teams can offer a guy $10M per year knowing that in their state thats equivalent to $12-13M for another USA or Canadian team because the player knows his take home will be the same or more in the tax free state. The NHL needs to have some kind of floating adjustment to account for this and for the fact cdn teams primary income source is cdn $$. It wouldn't be too hard to figure out, but will these things happen? I doubt it given how much the NHL now already depends on so much gambling revenue. There will be a lot of pressure on the NHL to see big market American teams do well because they will generate most revenue for their gambling sponsors. You see it in a lot of other sports already..Soccer, F1, any sport that generates massive billion dollar sponsorship deals, so I can actually see more manipulation in the future, not less. The cap should be based on after tax payment. It is the easiest way to balance the league. I haven't looked closely at the implementation for middle 6/ middle pair players, but when the pay is limited and then taxed heavy, I suspect this has a major factor in determining where to sign. It also distorts market value for that type of player. Sports betting is being used in Canada, and has been since the original Sports Select. To your point, with the lower population of Canada and less of a gambling culture, it will never be as big as in the U.S. Each team's front office should/will target their market accordingly. Maybe it's a Sportsnet deal, maybe it's merchandise, maybe it's gambling, or whatever.
|
|
|
Post by mrtea on Sept 3, 2023 12:35:30 GMT -7
I noticed that most threads on here are relatively specific to players, GM'ing, game day, and so forth. This thread is intended to discuss the other things. Examples include line strategy, play style, general philosophy, or things not in the other threads. Regarding general game play philosophy I believe in showing no mercy in order to hone the killer instinct even if it runs up the score. Last season I saw too often the Oilers dominant for a good stretch of time and then take the foot off the gas. This creates bad habits. Maybe I will dive a little deeper into this in time. On a different note. There is often chatter surrounding "destination" cities, or the perception of them. I think there is more hype and media propaganda than there is truth to the perception. I think each of the original 6 teams have high pressure not just the Canadian teams. Minnesota I suggest would also be a "fishbowl" market. Vegas I argue is not all it's cracked up to be. I for one can dress for minus 22 but can only get so naked in plus 42. I have been to all of the western cities and Montreal in the east. I find pros and cons in each one. Another point of consideration would be the differential of pricing across the league both for tickets and concessions, give aways, corporate vs individual ticket sales, expansion, another Canadian team, and probably more. This has the makings of a great thread Neufab! I totally agree with the Oilers shouldn't take their foot off the gas when they have a lead or ever. When the Oilers are winning, they are usually winning the puck races and battles. When they take their feet off the gas, they start losing puck races and that is a recipe for disaster. A beef I had with Nurse last year was sometimes out of the blue he would only focus on being in the shot lane and not seem to care if the other attacker goes around him wide. Why can't he be in the lane, but also take away time and space and make it hard to go around him. Too many times the attacker goes around him and circles back on the net or makes a nice pass to someone going to the net because Nurse gave him all that space to move around. I hate to say I saw that more than just a few times. I think he's having a hard time putting the high level game together in his head and sometimes makes the wrong decision. I hope he gets that under control because it was costly last season.
|
|
|
Post by drtaf on Sept 3, 2023 16:44:00 GMT -7
I noticed that most threads on here are relatively specific to players, GM'ing, game day, and so forth. This thread is intended to discuss the other things. Examples include line strategy, play style, general philosophy, or things not in the other threads. Regarding general game play philosophy I believe in showing no mercy in order to hone the killer instinct even if it runs up the score. Last season I saw too often the Oilers dominant for a good stretch of time and then take the foot off the gas. This creates bad habits. Maybe I will dive a little deeper into this in time. On a different note. There is often chatter surrounding "destination" cities, or the perception of them. I think there is more hype and media propaganda than there is truth to the perception. I think each of the original 6 teams have high pressure not just the Canadian teams. Minnesota I suggest would also be a "fishbowl" market. Vegas I argue is not all it's cracked up to be. I for one can dress for minus 22 but can only get so naked in plus 42. I have been to all of the western cities and Montreal in the east. I find pros and cons in each one. Another point of consideration would be the differential of pricing across the league both for tickets and concessions, give aways, corporate vs individual ticket sales, expansion, another Canadian team, and probably more. This has the makings of a great thread Neufab! I totally agree with the Oilers shouldn't take their foot off the gas when they have a lead or ever. When the Oilers are winning, they are usually winning the puck races and battles. When they take their feet off the gas, they start losing puck races and that is a recipe for disaster. A beef I had with Nurse last year was sometimes out of the blue he would only focus on being in the shot lane and not seem to care if the other attacker goes around him wide. Why can't he be in the lane, but also take away time and space and make it hard to go around him. Too many times the attacker goes around him and circles back on the net or makes a nice pass to someone going to the net because Nurse gave him all that space to move around. I hate to say I saw that more than just a few times. I think he's having a hard time putting the high level game together in his head and sometimes makes the wrong decision. I hope he gets that under control because it was costly last season. I think you might have nailed Nurse to a "T" ! He has to decide what style he should be? Is he going to try to play like "Makar" which is positionally brilliant, or is he going to play like Niedermieyer, which is to make forwards be "too shite scared" to try a move or theyre going to be kissing ice/elbows with their heads? Personally, I think hes only capable of the latter, but he thinks he's the former??
|
|
|
Post by neufab94 on Sept 4, 2023 16:08:21 GMT -7
I noticed that most threads on here are relatively specific to players, GM'ing, game day, and so forth. This thread is intended to discuss the other things. Examples include line strategy, play style, general philosophy, or things not in the other threads. Regarding general game play philosophy I believe in showing no mercy in order to hone the killer instinct even if it runs up the score. Last season I saw too often the Oilers dominant for a good stretch of time and then take the foot off the gas. This creates bad habits. Maybe I will dive a little deeper into this in time. On a different note. There is often chatter surrounding "destination" cities, or the perception of them. I think there is more hype and media propaganda than there is truth to the perception. I think each of the original 6 teams have high pressure not just the Canadian teams. Minnesota I suggest would also be a "fishbowl" market. Vegas I argue is not all it's cracked up to be. I for one can dress for minus 22 but can only get so naked in plus 42. I have been to all of the western cities and Montreal in the east. I find pros and cons in each one. Another point of consideration would be the differential of pricing across the league both for tickets and concessions, give aways, corporate vs individual ticket sales, expansion, another Canadian team, and probably more. This has the makings of a great thread Neufab! I totally agree with the Oilers shouldn't take their foot off the gas when they have a lead or ever. When the Oilers are winning, they are usually winning the puck races and battles. When they take their feet off the gas, they start losing puck races and that is a recipe for disaster. A beef I had with Nurse last year was sometimes out of the blue he would only focus on being in the shot lane and not seem to care if the other attacker goes around him wide. Why can't he be in the lane, but also take away time and space and make it hard to go around him. Too many times the attacker goes around him and circles back on the net or makes a nice pass to someone going to the net because Nurse gave him all that space to move around. I hate to say I saw that more than just a few times. I think he's having a hard time putting the high level game together in his head and sometimes makes the wrong decision. I hope he gets that under control because it was costly last season. I agree with your point on Nurse. The play Ceci didn't help cover up his mistakes. I think this is where chemistry on defense becomes very important. Bouchard and Ekholm seem to have it and I think became the top pair. If Nurse wants the undisputed #1 D roll to go with his contract then he needs to step his game up. His mistakes seemed to result in a goal against. His partner must also step up and show they have each other's backs. I think this speaks to having a clear vision and strategy which is up to coaching to draw out of the players. This requires consistent pairs that find their identity and then execute it. This is not to say each pair or line needs to play the same way. Coaches are mistaken in trying to force players to be what they aren't. The team becomes more diverse and unpredictable if one group is flying and playing off the rush and maybe you get a couple of groups doing so. Guys without the speed need to crash and bang, dump and chase, and bring a different element. This does not work as well with the 11-7 roster. By its nature, the flow and rhythm is disrupted in the forward group and on defense.
|
|
|
Post by mrtea on Sept 4, 2023 17:55:53 GMT -7
This has the makings of a great thread Neufab! I totally agree with the Oilers shouldn't take their foot off the gas when they have a lead or ever. When the Oilers are winning, they are usually winning the puck races and battles. When they take their feet off the gas, they start losing puck races and that is a recipe for disaster. A beef I had with Nurse last year was sometimes out of the blue he would only focus on being in the shot lane and not seem to care if the other attacker goes around him wide. Why can't he be in the lane, but also take away time and space and make it hard to go around him. Too many times the attacker goes around him and circles back on the net or makes a nice pass to someone going to the net because Nurse gave him all that space to move around. I hate to say I saw that more than just a few times. I think he's having a hard time putting the high level game together in his head and sometimes makes the wrong decision. I hope he gets that under control because it was costly last season. I agree with your point on Nurse. The play Ceci didn't help cover up his mistakes. I think this is where chemistry on defense becomes very important. Bouchard and Ekholm seem to have it and I think became the top pair. If Nurse wants the undisputed #1 D roll to go with his contract then he needs to step his game up. His mistakes seemed to result in a goal against. His partner must also step up and show they have each other's backs. I think this speaks to having a clear vision and strategy which is up to coaching to draw out of the players. This requires consistent pairs that find their identity and then execute it. This is not to say each pair or line needs to play the same way. Coaches are mistaken in trying to force players to be what they aren't. The team becomes more diverse and unpredictable if one group is flying and playing off the rush and maybe you get a couple of groups doing so. Guys without the speed need to crash and bang, dump and chase, and bring a different element. This does not work as well with the 11-7 roster. By its nature, the flow and rhythm is disrupted in the forward group and on defense. We need all our players to continue growing their games and striving to improve and that is especially true with our defensive group. Now that we have Ekholm, I can see there is a good chance of that actually happening. With Ekholm taking a little responsibility off of Nurse's shoulders and Nurse getting pointers, I can see him taking some big steps this season. Bouchard, Desharnais and Broberg can continue to learn the intangibles from Ekholm, Nurse, Kulak and Ceci and hopefully Kulak and Ceci can find their games again. A solid vet like Ekholm is so crucally important for teams to internally improve their defense. We are very lucky to have one of, if not the best top 6 group of forwards in the league. McDavid, Kane, Hyman, Draisaitl, Brown, the Nuge and McLeod, Holloway and a list vying for that ninth spot. It won't be a bad top 9 either. Woody has a dream job as coach because he can play so many different combinations that are used to playing with each other. It makes sense for him to switch up the lines like he does to throw the other coaches off trying to match lines to certain players or just looking for a spark.
|
|
|
Post by happyhappy on Sept 5, 2023 8:32:52 GMT -7
I agree with your point on Nurse. The play Ceci didn't help cover up his mistakes. I think this is where chemistry on defense becomes very important. Bouchard and Ekholm seem to have it and I think became the top pair. If Nurse wants the undisputed #1 D roll to go with his contract then he needs to step his game up. His mistakes seemed to result in a goal against. His partner must also step up and show they have each other's backs. I think this speaks to having a clear vision and strategy which is up to coaching to draw out of the players. This requires consistent pairs that find their identity and then execute it. This is not to say each pair or line needs to play the same way. Coaches are mistaken in trying to force players to be what they aren't. The team becomes more diverse and unpredictable if one group is flying and playing off the rush and maybe you get a couple of groups doing so. Guys without the speed need to crash and bang, dump and chase, and bring a different element. This does not work as well with the 11-7 roster. By its nature, the flow and rhythm is disrupted in the forward group and on defense. We need all our players to continue growing their games and striving to improve and that is especially true with our defensive group. Now that we have Ekholm, I can see there is a good chance of that actually happening. With Ekholm taking a little responsibility off of Nurse's shoulders and Nurse getting pointers, I can see him taking some big steps this season. Bouchard, Desharnais and Broberg can continue to learn the intangibles from Ekholm, Nurse, Kulak and Ceci and hopefully Kulak and Ceci can find their games again. A solid vet like Ekholm is so crucally important for teams to internally improve their defense. We are very lucky to have one of, if not the best top 6 group of forwards in the league. McDavid, Kane, Hyman, Draisaitl, Brown, the Nuge and McLeod, Holloway and a list vying for that ninth spot. It won't be a bad top 9 either. Woody has a dream job as coach because he can play so many different combinations that are used to playing with each other. It makes sense for him to switch up the lines like he does to throw the other coaches off trying to match lines to certain players or just looking for a spark. Agreed on D Tea. As for our forwards let's not get ahead of ourselves on Brown, he's yet to even play a game for us. I'm sure he'll be fine though and I'm excited to have him aboard, he'll be an upgrade on Yams indeed. Our 3rd line should consist of Holloway, McLeod, and Foegele I believe. Woody is lucky to have two of the best players on the planet on his team but with that there is a lot of pressure on him to put it all together and help bring that cup home. Anything less is failure at this point. No pressure Woody! Ultimately it's up to the players on the ice though. It's a fun time to be an Oiler's fan! GOG!!
|
|
|
Post by mrtea on Sept 5, 2023 13:28:43 GMT -7
We need all our players to continue growing their games and striving to improve and that is especially true with our defensive group. Now that we have Ekholm, I can see there is a good chance of that actually happening. With Ekholm taking a little responsibility off of Nurse's shoulders and Nurse getting pointers, I can see him taking some big steps this season. Bouchard, Desharnais and Broberg can continue to learn the intangibles from Ekholm, Nurse, Kulak and Ceci and hopefully Kulak and Ceci can find their games again. A solid vet like Ekholm is so crucally important for teams to internally improve their defense. We are very lucky to have one of, if not the best top 6 group of forwards in the league. McDavid, Kane, Hyman, Draisaitl, Brown, the Nuge and McLeod, Holloway and a list vying for that ninth spot. It won't be a bad top 9 either. Woody has a dream job as coach because he can play so many different combinations that are used to playing with each other. It makes sense for him to switch up the lines like he does to throw the other coaches off trying to match lines to certain players or just looking for a spark. Agreed on D Tea. As for our forwards let's not get ahead of ourselves on Brown, he's yet to even play a game for us. I'm sure he'll be fine though and I'm excited to have him aboard, he'll be an upgrade on Yams indeed. Our 3rd line should consist of Holloway, McLeod, and Foegele I believe. Woody is lucky to have two of the best players on the planet on his team but with that there is a lot of pressure on him to put it all together and help bring that cup home. Anything less is failure at this point. No pressure Woody! Ultimately it's up to the players on the ice though. It's a fun time to be an Oiler's fan! GOG!! You nailed me dead to rites, Happy. I did get ahead of myself with suggesting Brown as a successful top 6. Like you I'm not too concerned with how he will fit with the team, but yeah he needs to actually perform as a top 6 player before I can applaud him. With Woody, I think he is a good coach but there was a few questionable decisions he made last season and more importantly in the playoffs. When this season and the playoffs are all done, if we didn't go very deep, then I wouldn't argue with replacing him and letting someone else give it a go. Woody has been a good coach for the team and pulled them out of the fire when he was first hired. Mostly he is a very good coach, and I'm not ready to part ways yet. I'm just saying that if the team don't hit certain levels, then sometimes a change is needed. To be clear, I'm supporting Woody for this season but I realize there are certain expectations to be met this year. In the mean time, Go Woody, Go Oilers....get'r done!
|
|
|
Post by neufab94 on Sept 8, 2023 15:31:02 GMT -7
I think the Oilers chant should be "Go Oilers Go!" instead of the "let's go Oilers" chant. "Go Oilers Go" is more punchy, up beat, and positive.
|
|
|
Post by happyhappy on Sept 9, 2023 8:30:32 GMT -7
I think the Oilers chant should be "Go Oilers Go!" instead of the "let's go Oilers" chant. "Go Oilers Go" is more punchy, up beat, and positive. Fully agree! GOG!!
|
|
|
Post by toley on Oct 1, 2023 15:27:55 GMT -7
Just floating this but has anyone heard of a re-up with Rogers, for naming rights the arena or is that about to expire?
|
|
|
Post by drtaf on Oct 1, 2023 16:47:15 GMT -7
View AttachmentJust floating this but has anyone heard of a re-up with Rogers, for naming rights the arena or is that about to expire? Would love someone else to come in other than Rogers. It's so confusing that every CDN teams' arena is some derivitive of Rogers blah blah. i hate to say it but at least the saddledome was distinctive enough that no matter what they called it, everyone referred to it as the Saddledome. Oiler fans should come up with some unique nickname for the new arena that will override any corporate schtick attached to it like "Chrome Dome" or something?
|
|
|
Post by mrtea on Oct 1, 2023 18:18:13 GMT -7
View AttachmentJust floating this but has anyone heard of a re-up with Rogers, for naming rights the arena or is that about to expire? Would love someone else to come in other than Rogers. It's so confusing that every CDN teams' arena is some derivitive of Rogers blah blah. i hate to say it but at least the saddledome was distinctive enough that no matter what they called it, everyone referred to it as the Saddledome. Oiler fans should come up with some unique nickname for the new arena that will override any corporate schtick attached to it like "Chrome Dome" or something? The obvious name is the Oildrop arena because it appears to be made in an oildrop shape when viewed from above. Even if it stayed with Rogers it could still be the "Rogers Oildrop Arena". Edit: My first thought was "What, it's been 10 years?!!".
|
|
|
Post by drtaf on Oct 1, 2023 21:27:24 GMT -7
Would love someone else to come in other than Rogers. It's so confusing that every CDN teams' arena is some derivitive of Rogers blah blah. i hate to say it but at least the saddledome was distinctive enough that no matter what they called it, everyone referred to it as the Saddledome. Oiler fans should come up with some unique nickname for the new arena that will override any corporate schtick attached to it like "Chrome Dome" or something? The obvious name is the Oildrop arena because it appears to be made in an oildrop shape when viewed from above. Even if it stayed with Rogers it could still be the "Rogers Oildrop Arena". Edit: My first thought was "What, it's been 10 years?!!". Yeah I couldnt believe its almost 10years either? I hate to say it T but i dont think "oildrop arena" will catch on any more than the chrome dome. I'm guessing if they held a fan competition and say 2 season tix as a prize, they'd get some very clever names come up, even if it did have to have the Rogers name in it somewhere?
|
|
|
Post by toley on Oct 2, 2023 5:35:07 GMT -7
View AttachmentJust floating this but has anyone heard of a re-up with Rogers, for naming rights the arena or is that about to expire? Would love someone else to come in other than Rogers. It's so confusing that every CDN teams' arena is some derivitive of Rogers blah blah. i hate to say it but at least the saddledome was distinctive enough that no matter what they called it, everyone referred to it as the Saddledome. Oiler fans should come up with some unique nickname for the new arena that will override any corporate schtick attached to it like "Chrome Dome" or something? If it's getting renamed, they probably already have something in place. They seem to keep helmet sponsors under wrap so I wouldn't be shocked if they just randomly announced a new name. Just not sure who's willing to shill the cash OEG wants for a building sponsor? I'd thought of calling it "the frying pan", it's usually they original name that sticks, like MSG or like had mentioned the Saddledome.
|
|
|
Post by drtaf on Oct 2, 2023 15:42:38 GMT -7
Would love someone else to come in other than Rogers. It's so confusing that every CDN teams' arena is some derivitive of Rogers blah blah. i hate to say it but at least the saddledome was distinctive enough that no matter what they called it, everyone referred to it as the Saddledome. Oiler fans should come up with some unique nickname for the new arena that will override any corporate schtick attached to it like "Chrome Dome" or something? If it's getting renamed, they probably already have something in place. They seem to keep helmet sponsors under wrap so I wouldn't be shocked if they just randomly announced a new name. Just not sure who's willing to shill the cash OEG wants for a building sponsor? I'd thought of calling it "the frying pan", it's usually they original name that sticks, like MSG or like had mentioned the Saddledome. Heard some jealous flames fans call it the bed-pan, but frying pan sounds much better Tin palace is another one. They really should open it up to the fans. So long as "Tinny McTin-face" doesn't win, i'd be good with a fan vote on the name
|
|
|
Post by toley on Oct 3, 2023 7:33:00 GMT -7
If it's getting renamed, they probably already have something in place. They seem to keep helmet sponsors under wrap so I wouldn't be shocked if they just randomly announced a new name. Just not sure who's willing to shill the cash OEG wants for a building sponsor? I'd thought of calling it "the frying pan", it's usually they original name that sticks, like MSG or like had mentioned the Saddledome. Heard some jealous flames fans call it the bed-pan, but frying pan sounds much better Tin palace is another one. They really should open it up to the fans. So long as "Tinny McTin-face" doesn't win, i'd be good with a fan vote on the name Tin palace sounds good, I do like a fan given name like Shark tank for the Sharks. Tinny McTinface 😂
|
|
|
Post by neufab94 on Oct 3, 2023 8:49:41 GMT -7
Heard some jealous flames fans call it the bed-pan, but frying pan sounds much better Tin palace is another one. They really should open it up to the fans. So long as "Tinny McTin-face" doesn't win, i'd be good with a fan vote on the name Tin palace sounds good, I do like a fan given name like Shark tank for the Sharks. Tinny McTinface 😂 The Igloo 🥶
|
|
|
Post by drtaf on Oct 3, 2023 15:14:51 GMT -7
Tin palace sounds good, I do like a fan given name like Shark tank for the Sharks. Tinny McTinface 😂 The Igloo 🥶 Freezer maybe?? since it looks stainless steel the "Kelvinator" has a ring to it
|
|